The Republican Party Wears the Pants in this Family

Expanding a bit on a recent theme that the Republicans have a monopoly on testes in the United States government, Senator Jim DeMint (whose home state of South Carolina we all look to for national leadership when it comes to economic development), and Representative Mike Pence of Indiana are pushing for legislation to permanently extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich, eliminate the estate tax permanently, and “fix” the alternative minimum tax.

Democrats and Republicans agree that the Bush tax cuts for people making less than $250,000 per year should be made permanent. So what’s the fight about? It’s only over cutting taxes for the top 5% of wage earners in this country.

Next consider the estate tax. If current law is left alone, it’ll only affect those with estates in excess of $1,000,000. “The estate tax is highly progressive.

The top ten percent of income earners pays virtually all of the tax; almost half is paid by the richest 1 in 1,000. Much of the political debate about the estate tax centers around its impact on family farms and small businesses. In fact, almost no farms or businesses actually pay the tax.

This means that the current battle over taxes is entirely about how big of a tax cut to give to the rich.

Republicans are on offense – again – and Democrats on defense – again – on policy that Democrats not only spent the entire 8 years of the Bush presidency vowing to undo, but that should play easily to the anti-Wall Street “populist rage” that’s dominated our politics since the start of the financial crisis. As poll after poll demonstrates, public opinion is on their side. They control the White House and half of Congress. Yet they’re still on the run.

Let’s not forget that these tax cuts aren’t free, and that most Republican candidates for Congress ran on closing the federal budget deficit. When it comes time to pay for those tax cuts for the rich, though:

DeMint, known in the Senate for his hard line on spending and support for far-right tea party candidates, dismissed a question about how much his proposal will cost.

“I don’t accept that this is a cost to leave the money with the American people. We’re leaving tax rates the same,” he said.

Without the additional revenue from higher tax rates, the national deficit will climb by $3.7 billion over ten years, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. The upper-income cuts account for $700 billion.

Yet the White House signaled its collapse on this issue weeks ago, without extracting a single concession from Republicans. For their part, the Republicans are as full-throated as ever, even though public opinion is against them once again.

If the Democrats can’t find a way to win this fight, it’s going to be a long two years.

Politico:

“The president acknowledged he needed to do better,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporter after the meeting, though he stopped short of saying Obama offered an apology.

But Gibbs said the president did plan to increase “all kinds” of communication with the GOP, include informal phone calls and other unpublicized interactions.

House Minority Leader John Boehner, addressing reporters after returning from the White House to Capitol Hill, described the long-awaited session as a “nice meeting” and said “I think spending more time will help us … find common ground.”

Senate Republicans leaders told their members at an afternoon caucus meeting that the White House gathering went well, in part because Democrats didn’t appear “arrogant,” officials said.

Still, GOP leaders – led by Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Republican Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia— held firm on their previous vow to extend tax breaks permanently for all income groups – not just families earning less than $250,000, as Obama and other Democrats advocate.

This is symbolic of the difference between Republicans and Democrats at least since 1994: Republicans fight aggressively for their agenda, damn the torpedoes, while Democrats run from theirs, even when they have popular opinion on their side.

With no killer handsets, and the stuffy, suit and tie image that they have tried so hard to shed still lingering, Microsoft need to pull something impressive out of the bag soon if they are going to compete in the mobile phone market.

Windows phone 7 is not selling

You mean like releasing a completely overhauled mobile operating system with a simultaneous global marketing blitz?

Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast’s Action

Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast’s Action